Arbourist The Happy Abortionist’s Impeccable Logic.
Arbourist the Happy Abortionist happily reminds us of what her version — the feminist version — of equality entails. And, unsurprisingly, as it happens, it entails less rights for men, too.
Arbourist responds to my statement on my previous post — where I said it would have been both amusing and morally justifiable had one of the praying argentine men decided to introduce a single woman-attacker to his fist — with:
“Like using violence against women, uppity or otherwise, is anything new under the sun. Glad you condone it, as it speaks highly on what you think of women.”
I take it that Arbourist would have us believe that she wouldn’t consider punching a man who whips out his dick on her face then spits on her while spray-painting her crotch because to do so would be “using violence against [men], uppity or otherwise”.
See, in Arbourist’s feminist utopia, women aren’t just equal to men, they are superior to them; Arbourist and her ilk love to shout equality between the sexes but what they really mean is supremacy for women.
If it was the other way around, and we had the Argentine men doing to the women what had been done to them, we’d be seeing a lot of men in jail right now, charged, no doubt by people like Arbourist, with sexual assault. In other words, to Arbourist the Happy abortionist, violence should only be done to men and not to women, because equality!
In more other words: Feminist women, go ahead, spit on the men, spray paint their crotches, whip out those saggy titties on their praying faces, burn stuff up, vandalize a church — that’s all well and fine. While.. Argentine Men, go ahead, physically protect yourself from those women-lunatics — Oh no! No!! That’s violence against women! What an outrage!!
Arbourist, again, amuses:
“And here I was under the impression that feminism was about freeing women from male oppression and moving toward a more just society. “
Right. And there you were under the impression that “freeing women from male oppression” means giving them the right to do violence on men.
Arbourist further amuses by reminding us that abortion is O.K. because fetuses aren’t human:
“Let me know when fetuses start acting like full members of society, fetal voting rights, fetal driving age etc.”
Someome please remind Arbourist The Happy Abortionist (I’ve tried at the combox of another post, it didn’t work) that infants, toddlers, or even pets, who have the right NOT to be killed, likewise aren’t, in her words, “full members of society”, who can vote and drive, too.